HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8299
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 17:49
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 588
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8299) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.67 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.3
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKQ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 354 354 336 342 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 159
Write 64.4
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 342
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 7.9
34% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 13.5
DQ Mixed 12.8
10% 13.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT4G4DFS824A.C8FADP 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 18.5" 1280 720 GSM4BFD E1951
Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback