Today's hottest deals

Samsung 550XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 550XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XED-KF4BR
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 23:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 63
1-Core 103
2-Core 161
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 342
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C878) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.03 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 11
Splatting 8.6
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 643 170 184 123 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,331
Write 1,111
Mixed 1,094
SusWrite 388
219% 981 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 62.2
202% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 579
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 413
316% 436 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 160%
Great: 196%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 1TB
605GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 116 116 117 117 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 115
Write 118
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 116
24% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
4% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 26.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 13.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 4R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 22% 46 65 17 60 15.5" 1280 720 KDB0526
Typical 550XED Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 550XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback