Today's hottest deals

Samsung 550XED

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 550XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XED-KF4BR
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 01:02
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 156
2-Core 259
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 491
60% 458 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C878) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 20
Parallax 20.1
13% 18.7 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 14.9
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,414
Write 1,146
Mixed 1,180
278% 1,247 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 36.5
170% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 697
DQ Mixed 744
556% 738 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 196%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 1TB
512GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 107 106 105 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 123
Write 89.1
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 106
21% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
4% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 33
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 28.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 21.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 5R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 62% 16 80 56 60 15.5" 1536 793 KDB0526
Typical 550XED Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 550XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback