Today's hottest deals

Samsung 550XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 550XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XED-KF4BR
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '23 at 21:18
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 205
71% 131 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 469
47% 384 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C878) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 14.6
9% 12.2 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 12.9
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 981 872 157 142 141 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 689
Write 562
Mixed 1076
SusWrite 410
154% 684 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 47.5
155% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 352
267% 366 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 118%
Great: 196%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 1TB
615GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 99 99 98 45 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 95.1
Write 99.1
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 81.2
19% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
3% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 62% 13 37 2 60 15.5" 1280 720 KDB0526
Typical 550XED Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 550XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $143
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback