Samsung 550XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 550XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XED-KF4BR
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 19:18
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 62.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 275
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 639
69% 548 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C878) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 3.4
2% 3.63 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 3.6
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 867 119 117 121 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,182
Write 966
Mixed 489
SusWrite 372
167% 752 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 38.2
111% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 535
DQ Mixed 628
472% 636 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 134%
Great: 196%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
877GB free
Firmware: JU003F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 134 134 132 140 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 107
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 137
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
205% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0A06
Typical 550XED Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 550XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback