Performance Results

Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 63%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 11SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R6  (all builds)
Memory15.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220921
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 20:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 56.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 218
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 619
60% 494 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 132E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 30
Parallax 5.5
4% 13.4 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 992 49 23 79 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,530
Write 1,467
Mixed 1,187
SusWrite 216
246% 1100 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 32
215% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 888
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 745
560% 754 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 170%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 10.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R6 Builds (Compare 4,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop 74%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R6

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback