Asus CM6850

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CM6850  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6850
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110427
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 07 '23 at 23:16
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$137
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 186
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 424
45% 360 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Asus(1043 839B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.8
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
850GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 76 100 106 102 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 108
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 88.6
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 68%
Sabrent Disk Dev 500GB
316GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 68 69 72 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 210
Mixed 215
SusWrite 68.5
234% 177 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 16.7
1,209% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 23.7
1,799% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB
803GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 68 69 72 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 99.8
Write 104
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 68.4
101% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35%
Great: 72%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 5TB
4TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 115 117 121 128 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 118
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 117
126% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6850 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6850

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback