Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Alienware Aurora-R4 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 07JNH0
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '20 at 11:16
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 96.2 2-Core 186 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 366 41% 323 Pts	64-Core 456 28% 456 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.5% Above average	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 75.7 Parallax 65.9 60% 72 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 69.3 Splatting 70.4 57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 370 417 390 294 295 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 450 Mixed 431 SusWrite 335 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 42.6 143% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 361 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 129%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB 4,338 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 105 103 105 104 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 115 Write 102 Mixed 68.6 SusWrite 104 129% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 51% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 4x4GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 35.6 MC Mixed 30.8 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	584x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	459x
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	234x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	126x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	93x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	92x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	53x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	45x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	124x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 3,272 samples	58x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $415

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369