Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 84 2-Core 162 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 268 35% 264 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315 482 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 102F) 1GB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 1.2 1% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fc700 128GB 128GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0718B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 58 36 49 61 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 475 Write 33.2 Mixed 200 SusWrite 47.9 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 21.9 87% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27.7 DQ Write 51.7 DQ Mixed 21.5 22% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 91%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 126GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 78 78 78 79 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 77.6 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CF8 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 8GB 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.2% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 11.9 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM