Asrock H61M-VS3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS3  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '23 at 09:25
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1620-$49
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40% Below average
Memory 67
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 67.2
42% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 72.7
8-Core 124
12% 98.6 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.33 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94.3
Write 120
Mixed 33.4
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
26GB free
Firmware: CC3E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.9
Write 96.7
Mixed 59.6
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
AI Mass Storage 16GB
11GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.7
Write 10.2
Mixed 2.7
12% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B1GEP.4200C 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.1
4% 1.33 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS3 Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback