LG 17Z90R-EA5CK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLG 17Z90R-EA5CK  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z90R
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 18:34
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 179
2-Core 293
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 710
73% 591 Pts
64-Core 1,214
75% 1,214 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Device(1854 048D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3161
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.7% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 50.9
Parallax 25.9
47% 44.8 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 49.9
37% 44.9 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X101N 512GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51000A20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2582
Write 1735
Mixed 1,269
411% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 74.2
252% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,186
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 1,036
716% 908 MB/s
Poor: 120% Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
164% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 73
MC Mixed 62.8
185% 64.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 48.7
SC Mixed 26.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 164%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback