LG 17Z90R-EA5CK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLG 17Z90R-EA5CK  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z90R
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 28 '23 at 14:30
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 68.8
1-Core 182
2-Core 318
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 788
82% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,398
86% 1,398 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Device(1854 048D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3161
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 37.4
24% 32.5 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 11.9
24% 32.3 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X101N 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51000A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1401 1420 1997 1574 769 770 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,685
Write 1,388
Mixed 1,057
SusWrite 1,322
357% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 78.2
252% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,332
DQ Write 524
DQ Mixed 855
652% 904 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 308%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
164% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 73.6
MC Mixed 62.5
185% 64.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 49.5
SC Mixed 27.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 164%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback