LG 17Z90R-EA5CK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLG 17Z90R-EA5CK  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z90R
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 17:19
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 71
1-Core 189
2-Core 331
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 764
84% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,210
75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Device(1854 048D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3161
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 49.5
Parallax 42.5
46% 49.5 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 43
33% 39.3 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X101N 512GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51000A20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,779
Write 1,983
Mixed 1,355
450% 2,039 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 66.4
206% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 882
DQ Write 451
DQ Mixed 711
516% 681 MB/s
Poor: 120% Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
159% Outstanding
MC Read 56.2
MC Write 71.7
MC Mixed 60.3
179% 62.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 49.3
SC Mixed 26.9
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 159%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback