LG 17Z90R-EA5CK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLG 17Z90R-EA5CK  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z90R
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '23 at 12:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 66.6
1-Core 157
2-Core 308
93% 177 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 975
96% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,234
76% 1,234 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Device(1854 048D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3161
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 26.6
24% 28.9 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 50.5
38% 45.3 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X101N 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51000A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1593 1565 1481 746 761 760 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,786
Write 1,187
Mixed 1,898
SusWrite 1151
390% 1,756 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 86.4
285% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 808
584% 771 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 304%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
162% Outstanding
MC Read 58.1
MC Write 73.9
MC Mixed 61.8
185% 64.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 162%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback