Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	14.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180703
Uptime	42 Days
Run Date	May 30 '23 at 17:56
Run Duration	499 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 71.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 239 78% 144 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 742 71% 587 Pts	64-Core 1,133 70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 156 Parallax 157 125% 155 fps	MRender 173 Gravity 143 Splatting 120 116% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 137 110 104 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 368 Write 332 Mixed 279 SusWrite 136 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 40 129% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 202 155% 212 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 162 157 154 151 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	73% Very good	Read 97.7 Write 111 Mixed 68.1 SusWrite 156 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 211% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 90%
Seagate ST16000NM000J-2TW103 16TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 5TB free Firmware: SN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 263 263 264 263 264 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 7TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 175 173 175 172 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 108 Write 134 Mixed 74.4 SusWrite 174 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.9 272% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 90%
Seagate ST16000NM000J-2TW103 16TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 459GB free Firmware: SN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 147 147 147 146 147 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 123%
Seagate ST16000NM000J-2TW103 16TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 5TB free Firmware: SN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 192 191 192 193 193 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 123%
Seagate ST16000NM000J-2TW103 16TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 11TB free Firmware: SN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 186 215 248 257 257 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 123%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 455GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 75 90 100 96 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 84.1 Write 92.5 Mixed 95.5 SusWrite 82.9 123% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 48% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 61%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 75 90 100 96 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 61.7 Write 114 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 82.8 126% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 200% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 73%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 91GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 148 90 100 96 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 82.7 Write 108 Mixed 97.5 SusWrite 127 148% 104 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.6 220% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 73%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 163 Write 150 Mixed 132 187% 148 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.7 203% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 73%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 3GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 149 Write 150 Mixed 64 148% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.7 205% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 73%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 10GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 75 90 100 96 76 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 64.5 Write 92.4 Mixed 103 SusWrite 82.8 122% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 209% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 73%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 15TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 250 246 246 262 264 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 266 Write 246 Mixed 220 SusWrite 255 334% 247 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 1.6 693% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 4.2 DQ Write 11.3 DQ Mixed 1.3 444% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 149%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 157 158 157 159 160 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 143 Write 152 Mixed 136 SusWrite 156 202% 147 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.8 208% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 73%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 15TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 134 134 133 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 263 Write 238 Mixed 214 SusWrite 133 278% 212 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 1.6 711% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 4.7 DQ Write 11.6 DQ Mixed 1.3 456% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 149%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 15TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 134 134 133 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 259 Write 241 Mixed 208 SusWrite 133 277% 210 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 1.6 712% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 3.8 DQ Write 12.2 DQ Mixed 1.3 473% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 149%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 3.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 158 157 158 159 160 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 165 Write 172 Mixed 101 SusWrite 157 200% 149 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 61%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 15TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 134 134 133 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 238 Write 220 Mixed 194 SusWrite 133 259% 196 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 1.5 702% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 3.8 DQ Write 11.6 DQ Mixed 1.4 456% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 149%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 7,409 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 24.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 20.7 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	219x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $32Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $193Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $785

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)