Asus GL552VXK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL552VXK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VXK
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 16 '23 at 01:56
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 26.6
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 166
46% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 406
44% 348 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 17B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 5.4
4% 7.97 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.7
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 493 591 545 331 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 568
Write 448
Mixed 441
SusWrite 477
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 9.7
45% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 161
126% 174 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 244%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
854GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 103 105 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 60
Write 92.5
Mixed 54
SusWrite 102
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.4
125% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR24S17S8/4 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 7
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 275
14% 275 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VXK Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552VXK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback