Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '23 at 18:08
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 157
2-Core 316
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 1,217
110% 925 Pts
64-Core 2,099
130% 2,099 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (165 fps cap detected)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 164
Parallax 164
134% 164 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 165
Splatting 164
135% 165 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 127%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 464 461 414 371 371 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 490
Mixed 298
SusWrite 417
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 46.5
170% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 373
281% 374 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 112%
Great: 130%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
463GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 464 461 487 487 488 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 314
Mixed 444
SusWrite 469
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 60.9
182% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 374
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
685GB free
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2631 2648 2662 2659 2663 2656 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
403% Outstanding
Read 2,428
Write 2,775
Mixed 2,110
SusWrite 2,653
563% 2,492 MB/s
4K Read 72.7
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 66.9
290% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1470
DQ Write 1070
DQ Mixed 1,207
919% 1,249 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 403%
Great: 598%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
279GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1136 893 892 891 892 892 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,637
Write 2,108
Mixed 1,865
SusWrite 933
421% 1,886 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 68.1
256% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,253
DQ Write 840
DQ Mixed 1,033
774% 1,042 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 287%
Great: 355%
TrekStor DS maxi light 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 003f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 38.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 37.6
48% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 64.9
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 42.8
141% 49.5 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 39.8
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 131%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback