Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics180% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230203
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 13:59
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 314
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 1,226
110% 929 Pts
64-Core 2,226
138% 2,226 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
180% Outstanding
Lighting 257
Reflection 237
Parallax 262
210% 252 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 222
Splatting 166
181% 230 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 180%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 480 487 469 350 348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 486
Mixed 459
SusWrite 436
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 60.9
202% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 372
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 127%
Great: 130%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
601GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 480 488 487 486 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 490
Mixed 439
SusWrite 485
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 62.3
204% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
685GB free
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2501 2701 2669 2674 2691 2681 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
436% Outstanding
Read 2,850
Write 2,753
Mixed 2,496
SusWrite 2,653
606% 2,688 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 95.1
337% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,427
DQ Write 1,083
DQ Mixed 1,217
920% 1,242 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 436%
Great: 598%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
272GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1138 891 894 891 885 835 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,629
Write 2,408
Mixed 1,916
SusWrite 922
440% 1,969 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 92.1
310% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 1,011
754% 1,011 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 303%
Great: 355%
TrekStor DS maxi light 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 003f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 37.6
Write 38.2
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 38.3
50% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 59.9
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 40.8
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 38.7
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 125%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback