MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 18:28
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 141
55% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 521
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3906) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 208
Parallax 219
183% 217 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 151
Splatting 134
129% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,985
Write 1069
Mixed 1,138
308% 1,397 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 52.6
170% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 510
384% 519 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 172 171 173 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 160
Mixed 100
SusWrite 170
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
145GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 98 94 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 76
Write 112
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 97.2
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
135GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 75
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 71.3
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40
929GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 108 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 116
Write 44
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 109
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.9% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 20.3
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $767
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback