MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 15:49
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 214
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 596
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3906) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 204
Parallax 202
180% 209 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 152
Splatting 135
130% 163 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,627
Write 1,432
Mixed 986
299% 1,349 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 52.3
163% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 594
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 466
347% 466 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 170 170 167 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 112
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 168
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
157GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 113 110 110 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 157
Write 130
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 109
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
135GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 68 67 63 61 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 72.7
Write 69.7
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 62.1
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40
929GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 100 108 108 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 108
Write 46.8
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 102
53% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 20.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $767
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback