Besstar TL50

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBesstar TL50  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR Default string
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '23 at 10:08
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 69
1-Core 117
2-Core 280
81% 155 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 638
66% 530 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4310
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 22.6
17% 22.6 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.3
5% 7.33 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,328
Write 1,116
Mixed 1,032
258% 1,159 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 68.1
252% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 819
615% 820 MB/s
Poor: 120% Great: 222%
Seagate Wireless Plus 1TB
285GB free
Firmware: 780A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92
Write 62.6
Mixed 55.5
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 58%
WD My Book 500GB
400GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.8
Write 27
Mixed 24.1
36% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8x1.5GB
8 of 8 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 34.3
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 17.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TL50 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Besstar TL50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback