Besstar TL50

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemBesstar TL50  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR Default string
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 16:05
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 676
77% 600 Pts
64-Core 673
42% 673 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 25.2
19% 25.1 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 16.5
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-A02 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 914 925 931 180 72 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 840
Write 941
Mixed 798
SusWrite 521
175% 775 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 270
4K Mixed 68.3
285% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 402
370% 547 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 179%
Great: 202%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
167GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 376 352 355 350 353 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 431
Mixed 405
SusWrite 368
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 43.7
142% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 337
254% 340 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8x1.5GB
8 of 8 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 53.6
MC Mixed 37
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 18.8
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TL50 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Besstar TL50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback