Framework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemFramework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)  (all builds)
MotherboardFramework FRANGACP04
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 20:53
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 47.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 263
81% 156 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 787
80% 650 Pts
64-Core 1145
71% 1145 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(F111 0002) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 22
Parallax 21.3
15% 20.5 fps
MRender 18.8
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 15.8
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1364 1200 1227 1583 1448 1450 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,820
Write 1,426
Mixed 996
SusWrite 1,379
315% 1,405 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 51.8
169% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 650
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 750
553% 721 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 241%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-32GRS 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 26.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 16.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core) Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Framework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback