Framework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemFramework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)  (all builds)
MotherboardFramework FRANGACP04
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2256 x 1504 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221110
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 02:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 169
2-Core 244
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 457
53% 413 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(F111 0002) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 16.6
10% 16.9 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 13.6
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1166 1078 1018 1397 1399 1387 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,764
Write 1,553
Mixed 1,240
SusWrite 1,241
325% 1,449 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 49.1
154% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 455
341% 452 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 215%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-32GRS 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.9% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 27.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 17.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core) Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Framework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback