Framework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemFramework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)  (all builds)
MotherboardFramework FRANGACP04
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2256 x 1504 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 03:10
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 64.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 268
81% 153 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 759
80% 642 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(F111 0002) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 15.2
10% 15.9 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 12.8
12% 15.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 743 714 1076 1103 1146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 2,073
Write 909
Mixed 1,127
SusWrite 923
279% 1,258 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 35.8
134% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 875
DQ Mixed 564
496% 734 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 216%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-32GRS 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 36.1
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 24.9
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core) Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Framework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback