Framework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemFramework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)  (all builds)
MotherboardFramework FRANGACP04
Memory55.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2256 x 1504 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 03:02
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 58.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 268
78% 149 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 758
80% 639 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(F111 0002) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 15.1
10% 16.1 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 12
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 714 672 906 1106 1128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 2,003
Write 782
Mixed 1009
SusWrite 886
259% 1,170 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 27.8
111% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 740
DQ Write 782
DQ Mixed 783
583% 768 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 202%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-32GRS 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 29.4
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 20.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core) Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Framework Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback