HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 05:11
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 65.7
41% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 71.8
8-Core 130
12% 101 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4303
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 48 41 65 66 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 370
Write 247
Mixed 140
SusWrite 79.7
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 9.5
38% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 40.8
DQ Write 44.2
DQ Mixed 31.7
27% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB
97GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 35.1
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 37
44% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback