Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	50.2% Above average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 76 2-Core 104 54% 85.3 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 115 19% 133 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 179B) 1.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4303 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.9 3% 2.9 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.9 3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF870400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 63 40 84 125 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 337 Write 303 Mixed 287 SusWrite 92.4 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 5.4 25% 9.97 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 48.5 DQ Mixed 30.6 36% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 11.8 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 10.6 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 88.9 45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	1,222x
Radeon HD 7500MAMDBench 4%, 12,745 samples	173x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	30x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	36x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	32x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	28x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $227