Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 629
70% 550 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1319 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 90.6
55% 73 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 76
Splatting 45.6
49% 61.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 614 522 507 534 439 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,300
Write 408
Mixed 631
SusWrite 501
157% 710 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 21.9
119% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 430
341% 486 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 140%
Great: 244%
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
170GB free
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 140 142 144 144 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 442
Write 326
Mixed 326
SusWrite 162
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 17.6
91% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 35
69% 138 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 240%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
208GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 134 133 142 140 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 89.4
Write 108
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 138
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
341GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 69 70 70 71 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 87.6
Write 42.1
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 68.7
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL4G24C16U4B.8FE 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 26.4
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback