Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 19:24
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 236
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 578
65% 513 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 63
Parallax 85.1
50% 69.9 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 47.1
49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 910 1205 1333 424 564 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,210
Write 985
Mixed 885
SusWrite 886
222% 991 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 21.9
115% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 428
356% 521 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 161%
Great: 244%
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
170GB free
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 142 142 143 142 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 412
Write 379
Mixed 331
SusWrite 154
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 17.7
88% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 32.9
67% 135 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 240%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
208GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 135 137 136 141 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 96.7
Write 86
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 138
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
341GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 77 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 80.2
Write 53.4
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 77.4
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL4G24C16U4B.8FE 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 26.3
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $489
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback