Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 03:53
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 703
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 85.1
51% 70.2 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 47.3
48% 60.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 802 627 775 406 485 797 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1497
Write 124
Mixed 888
SusWrite 649
174% 789 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 24.3
150% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 372
DQ Mixed 430
348% 502 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 167%
Great: 244%
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 143 140 140 142 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 426
Write 366
Mixed 337
SusWrite 154
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 17.7
105% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 33.5
74% 149 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 240%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
804GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 196 198 198 196 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 127
Write 177
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 194
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
338GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 82.8
Write 51.5
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 71.9
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL4G24C16U4B.8FE 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 26
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 26.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback