Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 05:23
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 133
2-Core 260
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 783
76% 627 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.9% Very good
Lighting 91.7
Reflection 87
Parallax 84.6
75% 87.8 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 71.7
69% 86.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1353 826 647 548 501 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1541
Write 1,624
Mixed 1,177
SusWrite 672
281% 1,254 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 61.7
221% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 654
DQ Mixed 813
600% 793 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 206%
Great: 276%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
340GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1873 904 174 391 419 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,621
Write 1,235
Mixed 1,741
SusWrite 654
294% 1,313 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 68.5
227% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 833
629% 846 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 213%
Great: 365%
HP Desktop HD BD07 3TB
703GB free, PID bd07
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 86 86 87 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 84.1
Write 83.4
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 84.6
111% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 33.9
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 31.7
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,096 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback