Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 05:15
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 239
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 795
75% 622 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.5% Very good
Lighting 88.9
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 85.7
72% 87.6 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 72
67% 83.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1209 819 659 586 346 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,015
Write 1,758
Mixed 1,154
SusWrite 632
258% 1,139 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 37
199% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 648
DQ Mixed 824
606% 801 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 173%
Great: 276%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
340GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1659 838 133 177 284 201 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,704
Write 1,307
Mixed 1,422
SusWrite 548
278% 1,245 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 75.6
220% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 945
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 857
643% 859 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 210%
Great: 365%
HP Desktop HD BD07 3TB
703GB free, PID bd07
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 75 76 86 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 76.7
Write 72
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 79.2
104% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 34
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 34.6
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback