Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics94.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive411% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 21:57
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$291
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 220
2-Core 442
130% 251 Pts
4-Core 878
8-Core 1,583
148% 1,230 Pts
64-Core 2,831
175% 2,831 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 127%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.6% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 128
Parallax 116
93% 119 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 96.4
Splatting 106
98% 123 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$122
609GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3457 2425 1626 1675 2074 1928 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
411% Outstanding
Read 3,021
Write 3,214
Mixed 3,255
SusWrite 2,197
659% 2,922 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 267
4K Mixed 104
355% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,739
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 499
499% 846 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 411%
Great: 521%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
176GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2212 2216 2217 2217 2219 1985 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
396% Outstanding
Read 2,586
Write 2200
Mixed 1,544
SusWrite 2,178
477% 2,127 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 87.5
311% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,479
DQ Write 1,376
DQ Mixed 1,516
1,113% 1457 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 396%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
30GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 448 399 338 361 407 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 255
Mixed 317
SusWrite 395
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 42.2
144% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 313
230% 305 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
1GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 493
Write 479
Mixed 413
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 50.9
166% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 336
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 302 301 302 301 302 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 480
Mixed 423
SusWrite 321
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 50.5
166% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 340
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
232GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1436 1434 1437 1438 1437 1434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,960
Write 1,419
Mixed 812
SusWrite 1,436
314% 1,407 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 55.3
231% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 321
294% 468 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 260%
Great: 283%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
18GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 507
Write 480
Mixed 457
108% 481 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 48.8
162% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 339
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF4600C19D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 61.2
MC Write 58.8
MC Mixed 55.6
167% 58.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 52.9
SC Mixed 38.5
113% 39.7 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 155%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 2,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback