Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive430% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 08:58
Run Duration404 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$291
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 217
2-Core 430
128% 246 Pts
4-Core 843
8-Core 1,384
136% 1,113 Pts
64-Core 2,632
163% 2,632 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 124%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 132
Parallax 120
95% 123 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 99.5
Splatting 111
102% 127 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$122
610GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4177 3939 1494 1475 1635 1724 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
430% Outstanding
Read 3157
Write 4,006
Mixed 3,441
SusWrite 2,407
735% 3,253 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 259
4K Mixed 104
354% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,762
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 526
520% 874 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 430%
Great: 521%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
175GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2208 2213 2212 2220 2215 1749 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 2,665
Write 2198
Mixed 1,568
SusWrite 2,136
480% 2,142 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 87.4
315% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,475
DQ Write 1,385
DQ Mixed 1,514
1,114% 1,458 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 398%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
30GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 484 483 484 480 363 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 477
Mixed 410
SusWrite 463
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 47.2
172% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 343
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
1GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 477
Mixed 420
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 50.8
191% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 338
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
33GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 301 301 303 305 302 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 476
Mixed 439
SusWrite 322
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 57.1
199% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 340
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
155GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1434 1435 1438 1434 1435 1392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,012
Write 1,404
Mixed 873
SusWrite 1,428
319% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 57.3
239% 94.6 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 325
296% 470 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 264%
Great: 283%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
18GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 511
Write 483
Mixed 464
108% 486 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 58.7
199% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF4600C19D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 60.5
MC Write 60.2
MC Mixed 55.4
168% 58.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 52.3
SC Mixed 39.7
114% 39.9 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 156%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 2,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback