Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive410% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 12:49
Run Duration403 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$291
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 87.9
1-Core 220
2-Core 443
129% 250 Pts
4-Core 888
8-Core 1,644
151% 1,266 Pts
64-Core 2,960
183% 2,960 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 127%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.8% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 128
Parallax 118
94% 120 fps
MRender 167
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 110
100% 125 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$122
609GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3614 2399 1762 1982 1698 1903 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
410% Outstanding
Read 3,108
Write 3,619
Mixed 3,275
SusWrite 2,226
690% 3,057 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 101
339% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,687
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 424
454% 797 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 410%
Great: 521%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
176GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2214 2215 2219 2221 2222 2132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
395% Outstanding
Read 2,539
Write 2,142
Mixed 1,488
SusWrite 2,204
470% 2,093 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 88.8
308% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,478
DQ Write 1,383
DQ Mixed 1517
1,115% 1,459 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 395%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
30GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 484 484 484 484 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 457
Mixed 392
SusWrite 478
102% 450 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 42.9
142% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 337
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
1GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 458
Mixed 390
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 49.2
166% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 338
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 300 302 300 301 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 469
Mixed 415
SusWrite 320
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 50.6
164% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 339
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
232GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1433 1433 1433 1435 1434 1435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,927
Write 1,389
Mixed 833
SusWrite 1,434
312% 1,396 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 53.6
230% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 328
298% 471 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 258%
Great: 283%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
18GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 460
Mixed 444
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 48.7
161% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF4600C19D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
153% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 57.9
MC Mixed 54.8
165% 57.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 53.5
SC Mixed 38.8
114% 39.7 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 153%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 2,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback