Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics93.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive421% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 08:46
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$291
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 220
2-Core 441
130% 251 Pts
4-Core 880
8-Core 1,492
144% 1,186 Pts
64-Core 2,689
166% 2,689 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 128%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.1% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 127
Parallax 115
91% 118 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 95
Splatting 105
97% 121 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$122
610GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4401 4657 2538 1448 1556 1388 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
421% Outstanding
Read 2,734
Write 3,941
Mixed 3,120
SusWrite 2,665
706% 3,115 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 96.8
331% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,745
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 564
536% 881 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 421%
Great: 521%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
175GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2207 2205 2213 2199 2179 2193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
373% Outstanding
Read 2,223
Write 2,018
Mixed 1,307
SusWrite 2,199
436% 1,937 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 79.2
279% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,474
DQ Write 1,376
DQ Mixed 1,511
1,110% 1,454 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 373%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
30GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 107 101 102 99 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 479
Mixed 418
SusWrite 124
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 43.1
154% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 341
257% 346 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
1GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 476
Mixed 421
103% 464 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 50.9
167% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 337
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 300 298 299 301 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 478
Mixed 425
SusWrite 319
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.1
200% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 338
255% 343 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
232GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1433 1427 1389 1398 1434 1414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,049
Write 1,318
Mixed 910
SusWrite 1,416
318% 1,423 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 45.2
210% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 821
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 333
300% 471 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 255%
Great: 283%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
18GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 507
Write 485
Mixed 465
108% 485 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 50
165% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF4600C19D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
158% Outstanding
MC Read 62.6
MC Write 60
MC Mixed 56.9
171% 59.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 52.7
SC Mixed 36.1
110% 38.4 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 158%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 2,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback