| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus H87M-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130814 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 19 '23 at 00:58 |
| Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
58.2%
Above average
|
57% 99.4 Pts
|
37% 284 Pts
|
18% 299 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 871B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.7%
Average
|
45% 54.7 fps
|
38% 45.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 267 237 171 144 131 MB/s
|
71.5%
Very good
|
80% 359 MB/s
|
104% 30.7 MB/s
|
107% 170 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
189GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 348 363 392 403 387 MB/s
|
77.5%
Very good
|
87% 387 MB/s
|
101% 29.6 MB/s
|
102% 168 MB/s
|
|
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
215GB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 74 76 77 74 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
109% 85.2 MB/s
|
34% 0.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Vulcan 1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
44.1%
Average
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
39% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 394 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 75x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 49x |
| Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples | 48x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 35x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $239 |