Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H87M-PRO  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130814
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 12:39
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$86
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 188
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 336
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 871B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.9% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 48.3
46% 53.3 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 45.3
38% 46 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 46%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 198 204 150 155 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69% Good
Read 437
Write 380
Mixed 341
SusWrite 180
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 28.8
103% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 78
DQ Mixed 116
106% 170 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$138
166GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 276 344 340 404 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 446
Write 380
Mixed 374
SusWrite 343
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 30.2
102% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 123
112% 178 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 133%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
215GB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 74 77 74 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 135
Write 140
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 76.2
127% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Vulcan 1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24" 1280 720 DELA07D DELL P2412H
Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $240
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315Nvidia RTX 3060 $330Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $140Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback