Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H87M-PRO  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130814
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 04:42
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 182
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 325
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 871B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 47.8
45% 52.5 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 49.9
Splatting 44.8
37% 45.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 174 177 171 154 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 427
Write 396
Mixed 337
SusWrite 185
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 28.6
98% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 121
108% 170 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
166GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 288 365 375 406 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 458
Write 394
Mixed 392
SusWrite 358
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 28.4
102% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 75
DQ Mixed 119
109% 176 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 133%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
215GB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 73 77 76 77 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 136
Write 137
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 76
128% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Vulcan 1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $239
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback