FPT PRIME H110M2/FPT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFPT PRIME H110M2/FPT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H110M2/FPT
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 07:18
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 182
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 371
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.4
17% 19.8 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16.2
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tribal 128GB 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0513A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 36 48 40 53 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 384
Write 353
Mixed 320
SusWrite 69.1
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 53.3
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 26.2
21% 30.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 45%
Samsung HD251HJ 250GB-$39
184GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 98 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 99.5
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 98.4
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H110M2/FPT Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: FPT PRIME H110M2/FPT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback