Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_A409FJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_A409FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409FJ
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 01:24
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 19
26% 32.9 Pts
4-Core 36.1
8-Core 55.5
6% 45.8 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 117F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 1.9
2% 5.13 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 6.3
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 44 63 50 50 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 1101
Write 744
Mixed 701
SusWrite 109
147% 664 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 46.4
136% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 222
213% 332 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 111%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_A409FJ Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_A409FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback