Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_A409FJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_A409FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409FJ
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 17:07
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 232
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 621
68% 536 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 85%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX230
Asus(1043 117F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3198
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 12.3
13% 14 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 13.6
12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$54
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B1T3NA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 863 540 537 545 548 555 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,423
Write 1,322
Mixed 1,338
SusWrite 598
314% 1,420 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 82.3
283% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,231
DQ Write 1,129
DQ Mixed 599
608% 986 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 274%
Great: 311%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
598GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 86 95 96 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 60
Write 95.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 94.5
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.4% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 20
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_A409FJ Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_A409FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback