Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 15:17
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 80.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 262
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 934
84% 708 Pts
64-Core 2,985
185% 2,985 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 204
Reflection 188
Parallax 195
167% 196 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 140
Splatting 125
119% 148 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 140%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$550
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,425
Write 1,624
Mixed 1,380
400% 1,810 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 42.7
149% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 66.7
DQ Mixed 124
154% 291 MB/s
Poor: 201% Great: 435%
Samsung MZ7KM960HAHP-0E005 960GB
75GB free
Firmware: GXM1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 360 302 403 413 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 461
Write 411
Mixed 403
SusWrite 352
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 20.7
83% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 77.3
DQ Mixed 176
124% 161 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72%
Great: 119%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
274GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 620 142 232 151 291 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 744
Write 180
Mixed 875
SusWrite 301
117% 525 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 28.9
112% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 27.1
DQ Mixed 108
106% 179 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 282%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
659GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 756 741 958 855 781 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 906
Write 351
Mixed 942
SusWrite 802
168% 750 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 34.4
132% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 767
DQ Write 25.1
DQ Mixed 152
172% 315 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 143%
Great: 282%
Samsung MZ7KM960HAHP-0E005 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: GXM1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 302 292 358 330 289 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 459
Write 387
Mixed 399
SusWrite 329
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 12.9
76% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 26.1
52% 110 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 119%
SSK 2TB
649GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 245 220 108 134 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 337
Write 316
Mixed 314
SusWrite 193
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 22.2
77% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 66.8
DQ Mixed 19.2
48% 106 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 95%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 879GB
349GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 263 252 301 284 272 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.7% Above average
Read 449
Write 319
Mixed 381
SusWrite 287
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 10.8
55% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 18.3
49% 111 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 126 104 126 122 95 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.6% Average
Read 367
Write 177
Mixed 413
SusWrite 118
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 10.8
54% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 48.4
DQ Mixed 108
91% 138 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4R.M16FE1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 33.1
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 30.2
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 108%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,616
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback