Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 226%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 303%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics275% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory50.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 16:13
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 148
2-Core 281
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 966
88% 736 Pts
64-Core 3,047
189% 3,047 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$720
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
275% Outstanding
Lighting 395
Reflection 403
Parallax 517
322% 438 fps
MRender 561
Gravity 374
Splatting 268
313% 401 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 275%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$550
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,463
Write 1,984
Mixed 1,447
435% 1,964 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 65.2
215% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 491
364% 488 MB/s
Poor: 201% Great: 435%
Samsung MZ7KM960HAHP-0E005 960GB
75GB free
Firmware: GXM1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 336 346 392 401 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 459
Write 403
Mixed 394
SusWrite 367
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 29.5
101% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 125
100% 146 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 119%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
270GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 379 117 140 89 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 754
Write 181
Mixed 855
SusWrite 210
111% 500 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 29.2
101% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 409
DQ Write 63.7
DQ Mixed 72.5
95% 182 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 282%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
653GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 549 823 827 906 888 818 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 875
Write 342
Mixed 904
SusWrite 802
164% 731 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 39.8
136% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 644
DQ Write 47.3
DQ Mixed 136
152% 276 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 141%
Great: 282%
Samsung MZ7KM960HAHP-0E005 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: GXM1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 335 331 362 347 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 459
Write 391
Mixed 393
SusWrite 341
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 27.9
95% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 46.3
DQ Mixed 105
86% 129 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 119%
SSK 2TB
627GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 214 215 227 212 207 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.4% Average
Read 241
Write 212
Mixed 197
SusWrite 217
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 17.1
59% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 112
84% 117 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 95%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 879GB
299GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 221 199 223 199 203 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
Read 462
Write 338
Mixed 372
SusWrite 213
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 10.1
50% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 30
DQ Mixed 97.8
81% 122 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 59%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 102 105 114 111 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.2% Average
Read 406
Write 158
Mixed 277
SusWrite 107
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 10.7
52% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 64.4
53% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZR 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 30.9
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 30.6
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,613
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback