Thunderobot ST Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemThunderobot ST Plus  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT N858EX-H
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 14:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 235
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 620
63% 509 Pts
64-Core 752
47% 752 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 852B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7284
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 34.3
32% 32.1 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 37
Splatting 25.4
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D128 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C472101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 112 85 94 88 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1,001
Write 400
Mixed 447
SusWrite 106
107% 489 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 45.6
148% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 192
153% 221 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 142%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
925GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 113 110 113 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68% Good
Read 123
Write 111
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 113
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
220% 2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.4
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 9.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ST Plus Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Thunderobot ST Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback