HP Desktop M01-F0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 06:38
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 216
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 550
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 33.1
27% 33.6 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 23.5
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,220
Write 608
Mixed 1072
214% 967 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 62.4
199% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 752
557% 734 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 239%
Kingston A400 480GB-$34
277GB free
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 442 439 462 465 458 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 133
Write 106
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 448
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 9.5
47% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 217
138% 150 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
426GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 146 143 145 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 92
Write 138
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 144
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 23.6
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.2
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F0xxx Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback