Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ77CP
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181025
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '23 at 17:02
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 62.7 2-Core 107 53% 83.3 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 214 23% 183 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.4% Above average	Lighting 62.6 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 61.5 51% 64.1 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 62.6 Splatting 53.3 49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$69 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 378 412 424 390 343 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 403 Write 423 Mixed 415 SusWrite 376 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 30.1 102% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 238 178% 236 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 130%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 233GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 207 224 229 239 244 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.1% Above average	Read 194 Write 169 Mixed 178 SusWrite 219 43% 190 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 22.8 75% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 172 136% 188 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 209GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 251 250 250 248 279 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 324 Write 249 Mixed 286 SusWrite 262 63% 280 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 39.9 123% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 228 186% 265 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C8 4x4GB 1,004 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	46.2% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

SSD
TS256GSSD230S 256GBTranscendBench 89%, 3,887 samples	2x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	2x
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 GU502203EP0201 8GBElpidaBench 47%, 4 samples	4x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 3x4GBHynixBench 44%, 503 samples	2x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 GU502203EP0201 7GBUnknownBench 33%, 2 samples	2x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $119

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16