Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2807 9 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	26% Poor	Memory 48.4 1-Core 13.7 2-Core 24.2 22% 28.8 Pts	4-Core 24.2 8-Core 24.8 3% 24.5 Pts	64-Core 23.5 2% 23.5 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.52% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.52% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 64GB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM01.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 80 86 92 88 90 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.6% Below average	Read 221 Write 166 Mixed 187 SusWrite 100 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 18.3 70% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 78.4 DQ Write 61 DQ Mixed 69.3 52% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905603-035.A00G 1x4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2807IntelBench 33%, 9 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 64GBBench 53%, 250 samples	1x

RAM
9905603-035.A00G 1x4GBKingstonBench 20%, 18 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16