O.e.m EIBM-SAM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardO.e.m EIBM-SAM  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 11:30
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2807
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 18.8
2-Core 36.9
31% 41 Pts
4-Core 32.1
8-Core 37.7
5% 34.9 Pts
64-Core 36.9
2% 36.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 64GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 97 97 98 99 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 225
Write 178
Mixed 194
SusWrite 104
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 19.4
74% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 121
90% 120 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 73%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
14GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.8 6.6 6.3 6.8 6.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Read 20.1
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6.6
9% 8.57 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905594-001.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.9
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback